Basics on Social Democracy 32 to post-secondary school level). There is also a social security program for old aged and disabled citizens. Mauritius' social market economy had a positive impact on the country's development. In recent decades, it has managed to diversify its economy, produce a constant growth of GDP and avoid social conflicts. The latter achievement especially should be seen as the result of Mauritius' high social spending. The absence of violent conflicts is particularly noteworthy, as Mauritius suffers under similar simmering ethnic/religious tensions that have been the trigger for various bloody conflicts in other Sub-Saharan countries. This stability was probably the most important factor in the establishment of a strong tourism industry(aside from the country's natural beauty), which is nowadays the strongest part of Mauritius' economy. Despite the successes of recent decades, Mauritius and its social democratic state continue to face growing problems. Unemployment is constantly increasing; the level of education remains low – despite free schooling and the economy is not growing as fast as it used to. Consequently some are calling for the dismantling of Mauritius' welfare state. Costa Rica In 1940 Costa Rica had a lower or similar Gross Domestic Product to its Middle American neighbors Panama, Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Guatemala. While most other states in this region remain relatively poor, Costa Rica has become a middle income country. However, t is not Costa Rica's economic success that makes it remarkable, but rather the fact that it has managed to combine this development with constant protection for its workforce, in the pursuit of social justice. The foundations of the Costa Rican welfare state were laid in the 40s and assured by a constitution in 1949. Since this time Costa Rica has had a social security system, low-cost housing programs, a health-care system, a pension system, and even minimum-wage laws. Besides introducing this welfare system, the governments of the 40s and 50s expanded the public sector, nationalized Costa Rica's banks and used these banks to invest in long-term economic projects. Whilst other countries in the world found the institution of such interventionist policies problematic, Costa Rica's governments of this period managed to institute them so as to found a“golden age”, dominated by classical social democracy. Nevertheless, the first economic problems emerged in the 70s. The country reacted to these problems by instituting a further expansion of the public sector and by providing greater subsidies to suffering industries. Similarly to Mauritius, Costa Rica was seriously hit by an economic crisis at the beginning of the 80s, and only massive donor money saved the national economy. Structural adjustment and market liberalization followed, including privatization, public spending cuts and reduction of wages. Again similarly to the Mauritian case, some of the liberalization policies should be seen as evidence of the Costa Rican state's will to actively steer its market. The welfare state, introduced in the 1940s, today still assures basic security for the whole population. The social security system provides insurance for medical services, disability and an old-age pension, and those not