An example to improve: The commission where tasks are not clearly divided(e.g. Guinea 6 ) Unlike the good examples presented above, there are countries where the management of elections is entrusted to several institutions(including an electoral commission) but within a legal framework which is not very clear compared to the genuine sharing of roles. The relationship between the various agencies involved in the process to ensure qualitative elections are not properly articulated. The consequences of this situation on the performance of the committee and on the quality of elections include the following: · Tasks which are considered necessary, indeed essential for the proper conduct of elections will not be completed by default due to inappropriate distribution of roles; · Tasks will be carried out but in such confusion created by conflicting powers and others in such a way that the process would be compromised; · Structures(committees) established to carry out specific tasks will not work properly, for instance because of the inability of organization and functioning due to a bad combination of representatives of institutions. The provisions of electoral laws for the Guinean electoral commission 7 , called Independent National Electoral Commission(INEC), largely reflect the situation described above. In the organic law amending the electoral code of 2007, it is said, for example, that"the Ministry of Interior is 6 The information on Guinea is derived from the organic law no. 91/012/CTRN carrying the electoral code modified by the organic laws no. L93/038/CTRN of 20 August 1993 and L/95/011/CTRN of 12 May 1995. It needs to be added that a regulation decreed by the military regime has come to improve the fortune of the Guinean electoral commission. 7 It is true that the law where this content is mentioned no longer exists. Nevertheless, it perfectly illustrates the situation that is described above. 116