and Serbia’s Accession to the European Union An analysis of Serbia’s alignment with the European Union’s foreign policy declarations and measures: Semi-annual review for 2025 Authors: Igor Novaković Marko Savković Nataša Stanojević July 2025 Belgrade The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of ISAC Fund and it does not necessarily reflect views of the FriedrichEbert-Stiftung.

An analysis of Serbia’s alignment with the European Union’s foreign policy declarations and measures: Semi-annual review for 2025 Serbia has continued its alignment patterns with the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in the first half of 2025, similar to 2022 and 2023, when Serbia had alignment rates of 48 percent and 54 percent, respectively. Currently, Serbia has reached an alignment rate of 52 percent. This also indicates that, despite a relative increase in 2024 to 59 percent, the overall pattern has remained consistent. These rates are the lowest among EU candidate countries(Georgia has the same percentage), not only in the Western Balkans but also among others, except for Türkiye, whose pre-accession negotiations have been effectively frozen for several years. The main reason for the low percentage is that during the first half of 2025, the EU adopted two new sanction packages — the 16th and 17th — increasing the scope of sanctions and, consequently, the number of declarations directed against the Russian Federation in connection with its war in Ukraine. The alignment percentages remain merely a descriptive category that indicates the general trend of alignment but cannot be regarded as a definitive indicator of progress or decline. The specific issues on which candidate and partner countries fail to align are more critical. This is because EU foreign policy declarations and the measures they include may cover a broad range of topics, not all of which are considered equally important by the EU and its member states. These topics range from imposing, amending, or renewing restrictive measures against certain countries to declarations commemorating dates of critical importance to the international community. The most important issues are those related to the security of the EU and its member states. Consequently, the EU and its member states closely monitor alignment on matters that affect the Union’s global position, interests, and stated foreign policy objectives and concerns. This is the context in which the alignment of Serbia and other candidate and partner countries is being assessed. As in previous years, Serbia has avoided aligning with declarations and measures directed against the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China, including those targeting their nationals, entities, or interests. One of the main reasons for this position remains the issue of Kosovo, as Serbia continues to seek the support of both Russia and China in various international fora. Additionally, Serbia has failed to align with declarations and measures on other topics, though in most cases these have been connected in some way to Russia and the armed conflict it initiated in Ukraine. From January 1 to June 30, 2025, the EU issued 64 declarations calling on candidate and partner countries to align. 1 Serbia aligned with 33 declarations and the corresponding measures, but failed to align with 31. When it comes to specific issues, Serbia did not align with sixteen CFSP declarations related to the war in Ukraine; four related to Belarus; three related to cyber issues and cyber-attacks; 1 The count refers to declarations published on the EU Council's website, consilium.europa.eu. Some declarations published at the beginning of the year refer to EU Council decisions made at the end of 2024. This is because the alignment process was concluded at the beginning of 2025, and the final information about alignment was published as declarations in January 2025. 2

and one each concerning Guatemala, the EU’s Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, the internal situation in Russia, Moldova, the use of chemical weapons, North Korea, and Mali. On the other hand, Serbia aligned with three CFSP declarations referring to the war in Ukraine, the commemoration of important international dates, the situation in the Middle East, Sudan, and Venezuela; two each referring to terrorism, Burma/Myanmar, Iran, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo; and one each concerning the India-Pakistan conflict, Guatemala, the EU’s Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, Türkiy e, Syria, Zimbabwe, Tunisia, Haiti, Lebanon and Ukraine. Regarding the war in Ukraine, the EU introduced 17 sanctions packages between February 23, 2022, and June 30, 2025. Sanctions initially began with the annexation of Crimea and the outbreak of conflict in the Donbas region in 2014, after which the EU progressively imposed sanctions on Russian-backed entities and individuals. These measures include individual sanctions targeting specific persons and entities, as well as restrictive measures affecting the financial and business sectors, energy and transport, dual-use goods and advanced technology, trade restrictions, exclusion of Russia from public contracts and European funds, visa bans, measures against disinformation, and more. Additionally, sanctions were introduced targeting Russian sales of oil, gold, and various other goods and products. At the time of writing this report, the sanctions target over 2,400 individuals and entities. 2 These measures also encompassed Russian-controlled regions of Ukraine. Primarily, they were implemented through revisions and amendments to EU Council Decision No. 145 from 2014, which initially sanctioned individuals and entities, and Decision No. 512 from the same year(structural sanctions). Decision No. 386 from 2014 imposed restrictive measures in response to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol. Additionally, Decision No. 266 from 2022 introduced specific sanctions targeting those responsible for the Russian occupation of Ukrainian regions — initially Donetsk and Luhansk, and later Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. Finally, restrictive measures were also applied to individuals and entities involved in destabilizing hybrid actions against the EU, Ukraine, and other countries. These included tools such as intimidation, sabotage, subversion, foreign information manipulation and interference, disinformation, malicious cyber activities, and the instrumentalization of migrants. These measures are streamlined through the framework established by Council Decision No. 2643 from 2024. Regarding the declarations Serbia did not align with, of the sixteen related to the war in Ukraine, five refer to updates of EU Council Decision No. 145 and another five to Decision No. 512 from 2014. Three declarations refer to Decision No. 2643 from 2024, two to Decision No. 266 from 2022, and one to Decision No. 386 from 2014. This indicates that, as before, Serbia aligned only with sanctions based on Decision No. 119 from 2014, which extends sanctions against former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych and his associates for another year. Serbia also aligned with two political declarations related to the war in Ukraine — one calling for a ceasefire at the front, and the other concerning the then-ongoing Ukraine – U.S. negotiations in Saudi Arabia. Serbia further failed to align with the most recent addition to the EU sanctions regime, introduced through Council Decision No. 1484 from 2024. These sanctions were enacted in 2 EU sanctions against Russia, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions-against-russia/, retrieved July 16, 2025 3

response to Russia’s prosecution of opposition activists and independent media, initially driven by the treatment of opposition leaders Alexei Navalny and Vladimir Kara-Murza, along with their associates and certain opposition media outlets. The annex published in 2025(Decision No. 957 from 2025) added 28 names to the list. It is worth noting that in 2023, Serbia did align with an EU declaration issued in protest against Navalny’s treatment in prison. Sanctions against Belarus are also connected to the broader context of Russia’s war in Ukraine. Specifically, the EU has expanded the scope of restrictive measures originally introduced in 2012 through Council Decision No. 642. Since 2022, following Belarus's use of its territory to support the invasion of Ukraine, and due to the authoritarian nature of President Alexander Lukashenko’s regime, the EU has progressively introduced a stricter sanctions regime by broadening its scope and adding new individuals. In 2025, the EU published four related declarations, none of which Serbia aligned with. Cybersecurity is another area of EU foreign policy declarations and measures, frequently involving the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China. In the first half of 2025, the EU issued three declarations related to malicious cyber activity. The first, published on February 11, added three Russian nationals — allegedly connected to the Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation(GRU) — to the sanctions list established under the framework of EU Council Decision No. 797 from 2019. They are suspected of being responsible for cyberattacks that significantly affected the stability of certain EU member states. The second declaration, issued on May 28, updated data for six entries on the list — all Russian nationals connected to the GRU and suspected of carrying out cyberattacks in the Netherlands and Germany in previous years. The third declaration, published on May 23, responded to a cyberattack targeting the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Czechia, most likely carried out by Advanced Persistent Threat 31(APT31), a group associated with China’s Ministry of State Security. The EU condemned the attack as being“contrary to the United Nations framework of responsible state behavior in cyberspace, which all UN Member States have endorsed.” Predictably, Serbia did not join any of the three declarations. Another topic frequently associated with Russian and Chinese nationals is the application of sanctions under the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime. In the first half of 2025, the EU issued two declarations related to this regime. The first, issued on January 10(following Council Decision No. 3004, adopted on December 2, 2024), amended entries for 31 individuals and nine entities. Of these, 24 individuals were Russian nationals and three were Chinese. Among the entities, eight were linked to the Wagner Group, and one was connected to the treatment of Alexei Navalny. The second declaration, issued on May 3, introduced amendments for two individuals — both Russian nationals. Once again, Serbia did not align with either of these two declarations. Other declarations Serbia did not align with were also, directly or indirectly, linked to Russia. For example, the EU issued a declaration on Moldova on May 16, amending restrictive measures originally introduced in 2023 against individuals and entities deemed to be threatening the country's democracy and rule of law. The declaration introduced changes for six individuals and one entity, all of whom are connected either to pro-Russian political forces or pro-Russian media outlets in Moldova. On June 4, the EU published a declaration amending the existing framework for sanctioning those suspected of the proliferation and use of chemical weapons(Decision No. 1544 from 2018). The amendment included the addition of three institutions from the Russian Federation to the list of entities under restrictive measures. 4

Serbia once again failed to align with the updated restrictive measures against North Korea. These sanctions, originally introduced due to North Korea’s nuclear ballistic program, have, since 2024, also targeted individuals and entities that support Russia ’s war in Ukraine. Among those now sanctioned are three individuals responsible for maintaining close ties with Russia, either by supporting its efforts in Ukraine or by helping to circumvent EU sanctions on Russian oil and gas exports. The EU also issued a declaration on Mali, modifying the scope of restrictive measures initially introduced in 2017 and amended in 2021. The latest update lists several Malian officials and politicians. While the reason for their inclusion is not explicitly stated, all have been linked to supporting the activities of the Wagner Group and the Russian Africa Corps in Mali. Additionally, Mali recently severed diplomatic relations with Ukraine, which may explain why Serbia chose not to align with this declaration. Finally, Serbia did not align with the most recent declaration concerning sanctions against Guatemala. Interestingly, Serbia had aligned with the first declaration on this matter, issued on January 10(based on Council Decision No. 3198, adopted on December 16, 2024), which established the framework for restrictive measures. However, Serbia did not align with the second declaration, issued on June 24, which added eight individuals and one entity to the sanctions list. A possible — though not definitive — reason for this may be the involvement of Russian nationals in Guatemala’s mining sector and their connections to leading politicians in the country. It is also worth noting some inconsistencies in Serbia’s alignment behavior. One notable example is Venezuela. Serbia aligned with one EU political declaration condemning the fraudulent 2024 presidential elections and the repression of opposition and independent media by President Nicolás Maduro’s regime, as well as with two declarations related to sanctions. However, despite this formal alignment, the Speaker of Serbia’s National Assembly, Ana Brnabić, attended President Maduro’s inauguration ceremony last year. 5

Alignment with EU foreign policy declarations by other countries During the first half of 2025, Serbia's alignment with EU declarations remained among the lowest compared to other candidate and partner countries, standing at 52 percent(excluding Türkiye, and Georgia, which has the same alignment percentage as Serbia). In contrast, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Albania continued their trend of full alignment, each achieving 100 percent. The new candidates, Ukraine and Moldova, reached 98 and 89 percent alignment, respectively. Only Türkiye remained at the bottom of the alignment scale, scoring just 3 percent. Partner countries belonging to the European Economic Area(EEA) all achieved alignment rates above 80 percent, while Georgia matched Serbia at 52 percent. Among countries in the EU's Eastern Partnership initiative, Armenia — affected by its deteriorating relationship with Russia, the recent conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, and pressure from Azerbaijan — increased its alignment rate to 34 percent, up from 30 percent the previous year. Azerbaijan, on the other hand, did not align with any declarations during this period. State Serbia North Macedonia Montenegro Albania Bosnia and Herzegovina Türkiye Moldova Ukraine Georgia Lichtenstein Iceland Norway Azerbaijan Armenia Alignment Percentage 52 100 100 100 100 3 89 98 52 92 98 80 0 34 # EU Candidate States EU Candidate States EU Candidate States EU Candidate States EU Candidate States EU Candidate States EU Candidate States EU Candidate States EU Candidate States European Economic Area countries outside of the EU European Economic Area countries outside of the EU European Economic Area countries outside of the EU EU Eastern Partnership members EU Eastern Partnership members 6

Annex List of the EU’s foreign policy declarations issued during the first half of 2025 7

Declaration’s name Lebanon: statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the presidential election Statement by the HREU on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision(CFSP) 2024/3004 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision(CFSP) 2024/3182 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision(CFSP) 2024/3187 of 16 December 2024 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russ ia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision(CFSP) 2024/3139 of 16 December 2024 amending Decision(CFSP) 2022/2319 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Haiti Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision(CFSP) 2024/3149 of 13 December 2024 amending Decision(CFSP) 2017/1775 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision(CFSP) 2024/3151 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea No. Date Serbia N. Mac. Monten. 1 9 January Yes Yes Yes 2025 2 10 January No Yes Yes 2025 3 10 January No Yes Yes 2025 4 10 January No Yes Yes 2025 5 10 January Yes Yes Yes 2025 6 10 January No Yes Yes 2025 7 10 January No Yes Yes 2025 Albania Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes BiH Iceland Lich. Norway Ukr. Mold. Georgia Armen. Azer. Türk. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 8

Declaration’s name Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision(CFSP) 2024/3154 concerning restrictive measures in view of activities undermining the stability and political transition of Sudan Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision(CFSP) 2024/3198 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guatemala Venezuela: statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the events of 10 January 2025 Statement by the HR on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities Statement by the HR on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine Israel/Palestine: Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU welcoming the ceasefire and hostage deal in Gaza Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries with Council Decision establishing restrictive measures against those who support, facilitate or enable violent actions by Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela No. Date Serbia 8 10 January Yes 2025 9 10 January Yes 2025 10 10 January Yes 2025 11 14 January No 2025 12 14 January No 2025 13 18 January 2025 Yes 14 23 January Yes 2025 15 23 January Yes 2025 16 23 January Yes 2025 N. Mac. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Monten. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Albania Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes BiH Iceland Lich. Norway Ukr. Mold. Georgia Armen. Azer. Türkiye Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No 9

Declaration’s name No. Date Serbia N. Mac. Monten. Albania Democratic Republic of the Congo: Statement 25 January by the High Representative on behalf of the 17 2025 Yes Yes Yes Yes EU on the latest escalation in eastern DRC Myanmar/Burma: statement by the High 31 January Representative on behalf of the EU on the 18 2025 Yes Yes Yes Yes Fourth Anniversary of the Coup Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain 11 third countries concerning restrictive 19 February Yes Yes Yes Yes measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia 2025 Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain 11 third countries concerning restrictive 20 February No Yes Yes Yes measures against cyber-attacks threatening 2025 the Union or its Member States Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain 12 countries concerning restrictive measures in 21 February No Yes Yes Yes view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine 2025 Statement by the High Representative on 13 behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain 22 February Yes Yes Yes Yes countries on the application of specific 2025 measures to combat terrorism Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries with the Council Decision updating 13 the list of persons, groups and entities 23 February Yes Yes Yes Yes covered by Common Position on the 2025 application of specific measures to combat terrorism Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain 3 March countries concerning restrictive measures 24 2025 No Yes Yes Yes against serious human rights violations and abuses Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries concerning restrictive measures 25 3 March Yes Yes Yes Yes against ISIL(Da’esh) and Al -Qaeda and 2025 persons, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them BiH Iceland Lich. Norway Ukr. Mold. Georgia Armen. Azer. Türkiye Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 10

Declaration’s name No. Date Serbia N. Mac. Monten. Albania Ukraine: Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European 26 11 March Yes Yes Yes Yes Union following the Ukraine-U.S. meeting in 2025 Saudi Arabia HREU statement on the alignment of certain countries with Council Decision concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial 27 18 March No Yes Yes Yes 2025 integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine Statement by the HREU on the alignment of certain countries with Council Decision concerning restrictive measures in view of the 28 18 March No Yes Yes Yes situation in Belarus and the involvement of 2025 Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine Statement by the HREU on the alignment of certain countries with Council Decision 18 March concerning restrictive measures in view of 29 2025 No Yes Yes Yes Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine Statement by the HREU on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision concerning restrictive measures in response 18 March to the illegal recognition, occupation or 30 2025 No Yes Yes Yes annexation by the Russian Federation of certain non-government controlled areas of Ukraine Statement by the HREU on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision 18 March concerning restrictive measures in response 31 2025 No Yes Yes Yes to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain 19 March third countries with Council Decision 32 2025 Yes Yes Yes Yes concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Zimbabwe Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries with Council Decision concerning 19 March restrictive measures in response to the illegal 33 2025 No Yes Yes Yes recognition, occupation or annexation by the Russian Federation of certain non-government controlled areas of Ukraine BiH Iceland Lich. Norway Ukr. Mold. Georgia Armen. Azer. Türkiye Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No 11

Declaration’s name Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision(CFSP) 2025/377 of 24 February 2025 concerning restrictive measures in view of activities undermining the stability and political transition of Sudan Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries with Council Decision concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries with Council Decision concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination: Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Decision(CFSP) 2025/484 concerning restrictive measures in view of Türkiye’s unauthorised drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries concerning restrictive measures against ISIL(Da’esh) and Al -Qaeda and persons, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them No. Date Serbia N. Mac. Monten. 34 19 March Yes Yes Yes 2025 35 19 March No Yes Yes 2025 36 19 March Yes Yes Yes 2025 37 19 March Yes Yes Yes 2025 38 20 March Yes Yes Yes 39 21 March Yes Yes Yes 2025 40 31 March Yes Yes Yes 2025 41 31 March Yes Yes Yes 2025 Albania Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes BiH Iceland Lich. Norway Ukr. Mold. Georgia Armen. Azer. Türkiye Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 12

Declaration’s name No. Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries concerning restrictive measures in 42 respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain third countries with Council Implementing Decision concerning restrictive measures in 43 view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine Sudan: Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union marking two 44 years of war Date 4 April 2025 15 April 2025 11 April 2025 Serbia N. Mac. Monten. Albania No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes World Press Freedom Day: Statement by the 2 May High Representative on behalf of the 45 2025 Yes Yes Yes Yes European Union India/Pakistan: Statement by the High 8 May Representative on behalf of the European 46 2025 Yes Yes Yes Yes Union on the latest developments Ukraine/Russia: Statement by the High 10 May Representative on behalf of the European 47 2025 Yes Yes Yes Yes Union on call for ceasefire Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain 12 May countries concerning restrictive measures in 48 2025 No Yes Yes Yes view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain 12 May countries concerning restrictive measures 49 2025 Yes Yes Yes Yes directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran The High Representative issued a statement on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain 12 May countries concerning restrictive measures 50 2025 Yes Yes Yes Yes directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran BiH Iceland Lich. Norway Ukr. Mold. Georgia Armen. Azer. Türkiye Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No 13

Declaration’s name No. Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the alignment of certain 51 countries concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Myanmar/Burma Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the alignment of certain 52 countries concerning restrictive measures in view of actions destabilising the Republic of Moldova International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia: Statement by the High 53 Representative on behalf of the European Union Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries with Council Decision concerning restrictive measures 54 in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries with Council Decision concerning restrictive measures 55 against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States Cyber: Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on malicious 56 behaviour in cyberspace against Czechia Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries concerning restrictive measures in view of 57 Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries 58 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Russia Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries 59 concerning restrictive measures against the proliferation and use of chemical weapons Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries 60 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities Date 16 May 2025 16 May 2025 16 May 2025 23 May 2025 23 May 2025 28 May 2025 4 June 2025 4 June 2025 4 June 2025 4 June 2025 Serbia N. Mac. Monten. Albania Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes BiH Iceland Lich. Norway Ukr. Mold. Georgia Armen. Azer. Türkiye Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No 14

Declaration’s name No. Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the alignment of certain 61 countries concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the EU on the alignment of certain countries concerning restrictive measures in respect of 62 actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine Israel/Iran: Statement by the High Representative 63 on behalf of the European Union Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the alignment of certain 64 countries concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Guatemala Date 4 June 2025 5 June 2025 14 June 2025 24 june 2025 Serbia N. Mac. Monten. No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Albania Yes Yes Yes Yes BiH Iceland Lich. Norway Ukr. Mold. Georgia Armen. Azer. Türkiye Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No # Serbia N. Mac. Monten. Albania BiH Iceland Lich. Norway Ukr. Number of declaration country has aligned with 33 64 64 64 64 63 59 51 63 Number of declaration country hasn’t aligned with 31 0 0 0 0 1 5 13 1 Alignment percentage 52 100 100 100 100 98 92 80 98 Mold. Georgia Armen. Azer. Türkiye 57 33 22 0 2 7 31 42 64 62 89 52 34 2 3 15