Literatur Bajarūnas, Eitvydas(2025): Using NATO’s Article 5 Against Hybrid Attacks. Center for European Policy Analysis. Washington, D.C.(Insights& Analysis). https://cepa.org/ar­ticle/using-natos-article-5-against-hybrid-attacks/. Letzter Zugriff am 11.02.2025. Beebe, George; Episkopos, Mark; Lieven, Anatol(2025): Peace Through Strength in Ukraine. Sources of U.S. Leverage in Negotiations. Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft(Quincy Brief, 71). https://quincyinst.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/up­loads/2025/02/18171743/QUINCY-BRIEF-NO.-71-FEBRUARY-2025-BEEBE-LIEVEN­EPISKOPOS.pdf. Bergmann, Max(2024): How European Transatlanticists Might Approach an Isolatio­nist U.S. Administration. Center for Strategic and International Studies(CSIS). https:// csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2024-02/240201_Bergmann_Euro­pean_Transatlanticists.pdf?VersionId=q0TAI57aPlnADflpVLQ5DyQ3n5erczWu. Bergmann, Max(2025): The Transatlantic Alliance in the Age of Trump. The Coming Collisions. Center for Strategic and International Studies(CSIS). Washington, D.C. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2025-02/250214_Bergmann_ Transatlantic_Alliance.pdf?VersionId=N4SFWM3yi.tWs4E2s36jBd2Q0EJahQQo. Binnendijk, Hans; Kramer, Franklin D.(2023): Providing Long-Term Security for Uk­raine. NATO Membership and Other Security Options. Atlantic Council. Washington, D.C.(Issue Brief). www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/pro­viding-long-term-security-for-ukraine-nato-membership-and-other-security-options/. Binnendijk, Hans; Hamilton, Daniel S.(2023): Implementing NATO’s Strategic Con­cept on China. Atlantic Council. Washington, D.C. www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-con­tent/uploads/2023/04/REPORT_NATO_ON_CHINA_4.pdf. Brzezinski, Ian(2024): NATO at 75. The Alliance’s Future Lies in Ukraine’s Victory against Russia. Atlantic Council. Washington, D.C.(New Atlanticist Blog). www.at­lanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/nato-at-75-the-alliances-future-lies-in-ukrai­nes-victory-against-russia/. Letzter Zugriff am 03.04.2024. Cancian, Mark F.; Monaghan, Sean(2023):»Repel, Don’t Expel«. Strengthening ­NATO’s Defense and Deterrence in the Baltic States. Center for Strategic and Inter­national Studies(CSIS). Washington, D.C. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws. com/s3fs-public/2023-07/230706_Cancian_Repel_Expel.pdf?VersionId=bWauCA­FUtQqgbBLyuTS9n_0fyVgIQRiY. Chapter Three: Europe(2024). In: The Military Balance 124(1), S. 54–157. Charap, Samuel; Drennan, John J.; Masterson, Julia(2025): Scenarios for the Future of U.S.-Russia Strategic Stability and Arms Control. Results from a Track II Dialogue. RAND Corporation. Washington, D.C.(Conference Proceedings). www.rand.org/con­tent/dam/rand/pubs/conf_proceedings/CFA1800/CFA1896-1/RAND_CFA1896-1.pdf. Chesnut, Mary(2023): US/NATO-Russian Strategic Stability and the War in Ukraine. Center for Naval Analyses(CNA). Arlington, VA. www.cna.org/reports/2023/06/US­NATO-Russian-Strategic-Stability-in-Ukraine.pdf. Coffey, Luke(2022): NATO Needs a New Strategy for the Baltic Sea. Hudson Institu­te. Washington, D.C.(Policy Memo). https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.hudson.org/ NATO+Needs+a+New+Strategy+for+the+Baltic+Sea.pdf. Coffey, Luke(2024): The North Atlantic Treaty Organization at 75. Reflecting on Past Successes and Planning for the Future – Testimony before Congress. Hudson Institu­te. Washington, D.C. www.hudson.org/security-alliances/reflecting-past-successes­planning-future-luke-coffey. Council on Foreign Relations(2024): Does NATO Have a Role in Asia? New York(Ex­pert Brief). www.cfr.org/expert-brief/does-nato-have-role-asia. Davidson, Jason(2024): NATO Should be Ambitious with its New Southern Flank Strategy. Atlantic Council. Washington, D.C.(New Atlanticist Blog). www.atlantic­council.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/nato-should-be-ambitious-with-its-new-southern­flank-strategy/. Letzter Zugriff am 01.02.2024. Donnelly, Giselle; Joja, Iulia; Rohac, Dalibor(2024): NATO Beyond 75: The Task That Remains Before Us. American Enterprise Institute. Washington, D.C. www.aei.org/ wp-content/uploads/2024/07/NATO-Beyond-75.pdf?x85095. Dowd, Anna M.; Pezard, Stephanie; Flanagan, Stephen J.; Lataillade, Clara de(2024): Sustaining the Transatlantic Alliance. 75 Years of RAND Insights on NATO. RAND Corporation. Santa Monica, Washington, D.C. www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/ pubs/research_reports/RRA3200/RRA3235-1/RAND_RRA3235-1.pdf. Letzter Zugriff am 27.03.2025. Droin, Mathieu; Encina, Carlota G.; Hudson, Cameron; Uysal, Selin(2024): NATO and Its South. Redefining the Terms. Center for Strategic and International Studies(CSIS). Washington, D.C.(Critical Questions). www.csis.org/analysis/nato-and-its-south-re­defining-terms. Eaglen, Mackenzie(2022):$ 846 Billion. The Budget the U.S. Military Really Needs. American Enterprise Institute. Washington, D.C. www.aei.org/op-eds/846-billion-the­budget-the-u-s-military-really-needs/. Letzter Zugriff am 07.03.2025. Edelman, Eric; Miller, Franklin C.(2024): An Ongoing and Necessary Renaissance. NATO’s Nuclear Posture. Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Washing­ton, D.C.(Research Brief). https://csbaonline.org/uploads/documents/NATO_Nucle­ar_Posture_Brief_FINAL.pdf. Edelman, Eric S.; Manning, David; Miller, Franklin C.(2024): NATO’s Decision Pro­cess Has an Achilles’ Heel. Atlantic Council. Washington, D.C.(New Atlanticist Blog). www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/natos-decision-process-has-an-achil­les-heel/. Letzter Zugriff am 12.03.2024. Ellis, J. C.(2024): Allied Burden Sharing: The United States Shoulders an Unsustai­nable Weight. A Marathon Initiative Infographics Series. Marathon Initiative. https:// themarathoninitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/JCE-TMI_USA-Allied-Bur­den-Sharing_V4.pdf. Frederick, Bryan; Charap, Samuel; Boston, Scott; Flanagan, Stephen J.; Mazarr, Michael J.; Moroney, Jennifer D.; Mueller, Karl P.(2022): Pathways to Russian Escalation Against NATO from the Ukraine War. RAND Corporation. Washington, D.C. www.rand.org/con­tent/dam/rand/pubs/perspectives/PEA1900/PEA1971-1/RAND_PEA1971-1.pdf. Gerspacher, Nadia(2024): NATO Partnerships with Sub-Sahara Africa Partners. In: Regina Karp und Richard W. Maass(Hg.): Alliances and Partnerships in a Complex and Challenging Security Environment. Norfolk, Virginia, S. 145–154. Greenway, Robert; Gardiner, Nile(2024): A New Axis of Evil Has Formed. America Needs NATO More Than Ever. Heritage Foundation. Washington, D.C.(Commentary). www.heritage.org/europe/commentary/new-axis-evil-has-formed-america-needs-na­to-more-ever. Letzter Zugriff am 07.02.2024. Haass, Richard; Kupchan, Charles(2023): The West Needs a New Strategy in Ukrai­ne. A Plan for Getting From the Battlefield to the Negotiating Table. In: Foreign Af­fairs(online), 13.04.2023. www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/russia-richard-haass-west­battlefield-negotiations. Letzter Zugriff am 07.03.2025. Herdt, Courtney; Zublic, Matthew(2022): Baltic Conflict. Russia’s Goal to Distract NATO? Center for Strategic and International Studies(CSIS). Washington, D.C. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/221114_Herdt_ Baltic_Conflict_0.pdf?v9StY.fatq5Iqt5arUvFQNwoK8Dci1Q1. Hooker, R. D.; Molot, Max(2025): Building a Stronger Europe. A Companion to the Belfer Center Task Force Report on a New Transatlantic Bargain. Published by Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. Cambridge, MA. www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/Belfer_Building a Stronger Euro­pe_Companion Report_1.2.pdf. Karp, Regina; Maass, Richard W.(Hg.)(2024): Alliances and Partnerships in a Com­plex and Challenging Security Environment. NATO Allied Command Transformation; Old Dominion University. Norfolk, Virginia. Kiel Institut für Weltwirtschaft(o.D.): Ukraine Support Tracker. A Database of Mili­tary, Financial and Humanitarian Aid to Ukraine. Kiel. www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war­against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/?cookieLevel=not-set. Letzter Zugriff am 24.04.2023. Kochis, Daniel; Spoehr, Thomas; Coffey, Luke; Geller, Patty-Jane(2022): The Russian Threat: Bolstering NATO Deterrence at a Critical Time. Heritage Foundation. Wa­shington, D.C.(Issue Brief, 5252). www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2022-03/ IB5252.pdf. Letzter Zugriff am 21.02.2024. Kramer, Franklin D.; Agachi, Anca(2024): Four NATO Defense Priorities for the Up­coming Washington Summit. Atlantic Council. Washington, D.C.(New Atlanticist Blog). www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/four-nato-defense-priorities-for­the-upcoming-washington-summit/. Letzter Zugriff am 21.02.2024. Kramer, Franklin D.; Dailey, Ann Marie; Brodfuehrer, Joslyn(2024): NATO Multido­main Operations. Near- and Medium-Term Priority Initiatives. Atlantic Council. Wa­shington, D.C.(Issue Brief). www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue­brief/nato-multidomain-operations/. Letzter Zugriff am 21.02.2024. Kube, Courtney; Lubold, Gordon(2025): Trump Admin Considers Giving Up NATO Com­mand that Has Been Exclusively American since Eisenhower. In: NBC News(online), 18.03.2025. www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-admin-considers-giving­nato-command-exclusively-american-eisenho-rcna196503. Letzter Zugriff am 27.03.2025. Logan, Justin(2023): Uncle Sucker – Why U.S. Efforts at Defense Burdensharing Fail. CATO(Policy Analysis, 940). www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2023-03/poli­ceyanalysis-940.pdf. Literatur 15