Table 16a: Response to non -observance Valid Missing Total Complained Called a meeting Indifference Reported to union Total System Frequency 46 6 46 26 124 254 378 Source: Field survey, 2009 Percent 12.2 1.6 12.2 6.9 32.8 67.2 100.0 Valid Percent 37.1 4.8 37.1 21.0 100.0 Cumulative Percent 37.1 41.9 79.0 100.0 Table 16b: Response to non-observance by Sector Name of sector Total Telecommunication Oil& Gas Banking Complained 8(50%) 20(32.25%) 18(39.13%) 46(37.09%) Response to non-observance Called a meeting Indifference Reported to union 2(12.5%) 6(37.5%) 16(25.80%) 26(41.93%) 4(8.69%) 24(52.17%) 6(4.8%) 46(37.09%) 26(21.0%) Total 16(12.90%) 62(50%) 46(37.09%) 124 Source: Field survey, 2009 Table 16c: Response to non-observance by Gender Sex Total Male Female Response of non-observance Complained 24(27.27%) Called a meeting 6(6.81%) Indifference 34(38.36%) Reporting to union Total 24(27.27%) 88(70.96%) 22(61.11%) 46(37.09%) 6(4.83%) 12(33.34%) 2(5.56%) 36(29.03%) 46(37.09%) 28(22.58%) 124 Source: Field survey, 2009 The distribution of respondents by gender is quite interesting. As shown in table 16c above, the highest single percentage of female respondents(61.1%) complained about non-observance of their rights whereas it is only 27.27% for men. However, a higher percentage of men remained indifferent(38.36%)(which is also the highest 40