Publikationen der StiftungEqualize
Publikationen der StiftungEqualize
Inhalt
- FRIEDRICH-EBERT-STIFTUNG REGIONAL OFFICE FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION DEMOCRACY OF THE FUTURE
- FRIEDRICH-EBERT-STIFTUNG OFICINA MADRID
- ETERON – INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND SOCIAL CHANGE
- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- LIST OF FIGURES
- EXECUTIVE
- SUMMARY
- Policy recommendations
- INTRODUCTION
- 1. THE GEN Z GENDER DIVIDE IN POLITICAL ENGAGEMENT
- 1.1 Gender gaps in political behaviour: From the traditional to the modern gender gap
- 1.1.1 The recent Gen Z gender divide
- 1.1.2 Is there a Gen Z gender divide?
- 1.2 Relevant theoretical approaches for explaining potential Gen Z gender divides
- 1.2.1 The gendered consequences of modernising and liberalising societies
- 1.2.2 Young women today outperform young men in terms of educational and labour market performance
- 1.2.3 Gender differences in social media consumption
- 2. IS THERE A GEN Z GENDER DIVIDE? WHAT THE DATA SHOWS
- 2.1 Sample, data and estimation
- 2.2 Empirical results
- 2.2.1 Left-right self-placement
- 2.2.2 Voting patterns
- 2.2.3 Gender equality attitudes
- 2.2.4 Other political attitudes
- 2.3 Discussion
- 3. GENDER, POLITICS AND THE NEGOTIATION OF EQUALITY AMONG GEN Z: QUALITATIVE INSIGHTS
- 3.1 Methodological approach
- 3.2 Young adults’ perceptions of society and self: Shaped by multiple crises and individual coping under structural constraints
- 3.2.1 Prioritised challenges
- 3.2.2 Gendered framing of societal challenges
- 3.2.3 Tone of assessment across countries
- 3.3 Perceptions of political actors and institutions: Performance matters more than ideology
- 3.3.1 Broken promises, fragile trust and unproductive polarisation: Political parties’ lack of output legitimacy in the eyes of young adults
- 3.3.2 Gender differences exist: Stronger cross-national variation in political evaluations
- 3.4 Gender equality: Shared recognition of inequality, diverging gendered experiences and perspectives
- 3.4.1 Broad agreement on gender inequality but divergent salience
- 3.5 Between agreement, ambivalence and moderate backlash: Divergent meanings attached to feminism
- 3.5.1 Minimal agreement on the principles of feminism (not the term itself)
- 3.5.2 Divergent identification and emotional engagement with feminism
- 3.5.3 Navigating “extreme feminism”: Ambivalence, distancing and subtle anti-feminist discourses
- 3.5.4 Reflections on the approach and findings
- 3.5.5 Summary
- CONCLUSION
- Patterns in political attitudes and behaviour
- Perspectives and lived experiences of Gen Z
- Implications for policy and progressive politics
- ANNEX
- Additional information on data and methods
- ENDNOTES
- ABOUT
- THE AUTHORS,
- FEPS & PARTNERS
- ABOUT THE AUTHORS
- ABOUT THE FOUNDATION FOR EUROPEAN PROGRESSIVE STUDIES (FEPS)
- ABOUT THE FRIEDRICH-EBERT-STIFTUNG REGIONAL OFFICE FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION - DEMOCRACY OF THE FUTURE
- ABOUT THE FRIEDRICH-EBERT-STIFTUNG OFICINA MADRID
- ABOUT ETERON – INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND SOCIAL CHANGE