Publikationen der StiftungEmbracing feminist foreign policy within EU strategic foresight capabilities
Titel

Zur Seitenansicht

Titelaufnahme

Zugriffsbeschränkung
  •  Das Dokument ist frei verfügbar
Links
Dateien
Klassifikation
Zusammenfassung
  • Crises have consistently served as transformative catalysts for the European Union (EU), propelling its integration and global standing, uniting diverse voices in coordinated responses amid chaos. However, as the EU increasingly embraces a narrative of �poly-crisis�, we must question whether this crisis-focused mindset traps the EU in the present and limits its ability to address broader issues. The pandemic, economic crises, conflicts and climate disasters uncovered deepseated systemic issues that require comprehensive and long-term solutions. Reactive policymaking has hindered the EU�s ability to proactively shape long-term transformations and tackle the underlying causes of crises, including widespread inequality in rights, opportunities and resources. Feminist foreign policy (FFP) provides a powerful framework for action and is embraced by a growing number of countries. It calls for actively dismantling entrenched power dynamics and embracing gender equality as a guiding principle in foreign policy, inspiring transformative progress on a global scale. While some EU member states are leading the way on FFP, discussions at the EU level often lack a true feminist perspective, treating gender mainstreaming as a mere technocratic formality. This policy brief calls for integrating FFP into EU foresight practices to prioritise equity, sustainability and resilience in global engagements. By leveraging its capacity for future planning, the EU can make inclusive and purpose-driven foreign policy decisions, building on existing efforts. Inclusivity and diversity should be the cornerstone of this approach, creating the conditions for women and traditionally marginalised groups to actively participate and lead in shaping our future and co-create solutions for systemic challenges and structural inequalities.