This article analyzes the current situation of the relationship between the state of Jordan and the Muslim Brotherhood, and the main reasons behind ending the old roles of the relation. Study assumes that the current crisis, since 2013, is unprecedented, and that there is a conflict between them in the redrawing of the rules thenew relationship, while the "state" deals with the theory of "winner and loser", the group tries to focus on its importance as a moderate political party, with which it can be reconciled to overcome the huge challenges for Jordan, whether internally or externally. The study starts from a key question: What does the state want from the group? Then it approaches the internal discussions of how the main currents in the group interact with these shifts and how the new policies of the governments towards the group are read, and it provides a framework for the options presented in the corridors of the "Brotherhood", to deal with the new situation. Then it ends with results for what both parties want; The state and the community, and whether there is actually a possibility of agreement between them on the rules of a new game, based on digesting the new variables and transformations and redefining the relationship between them.