Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 22/15 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 16.-30. November Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Terror in Paris................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Terror in Israel.................................................................................................................................................. 3 3. EU-Richtlinien zur Kennzeichnung von Siedlerprodukten................................................................................ 4 4. Medienquerschnitt............................................................................................................................................ 6 1. Terror in Paris Die Terrorattentate in Paris brachten in Israel die Debatte neu in Schwung, ob zwischen dem palästi­nensischen Widerstand und dem globalen islamisti­schen Terror ein Vergleich gezogen werden könne. Die Regierungskoalition vertritt die Haltung, dass kein Unterschied zwischen Terror und Terror beste­he. Kritiker werfen den rechten Politikern vor, sich damit aus der Verantwortung zu ziehen, anstatt konstruktive Lösungen für den Konflikt voranzutrei­ben. Israel reagierte auf die Anschläge mit Solidari­tätsbekundungen für das französische Volk. Gleich­zeitig warfen israelische Sicherheitsexperten der Regierung in Paris vor, warnende Zeichen nicht ernst genommen zu haben. Frankreich könne aus der Erfahrung, die Israel mit dem Terror seit Jahr­zehnten macht, lernen. Our world: Radical Islam – the invisible enemy (…) it is easy to understand what motivates Islamic terrorists.(…) They want the world to be run by an Islamic empire. When they are in charge, they will kill, subjugate, convert or enslave all non-Muslims, except Jews. The Jews will be obliterated.(…) T he operational consequences of the West’s refusal to acknowledge the nature of the forces waging war against it have been disastrous. Radical Islam is an ideology that serves both as an organizing principle for civil societies and a military doctrine. By ignoring it, the US and the rest of the free nations of the world have made it impossible to conceptualize or implement a strategy for either discrediting it or defeating its adherents. Rather than develop com­prehensive plans for dealing with this enemy, the Americans, the Europeans and others have opted for a mix of policies running the spectrum from ap­peasement to whack-a- mole operations.(…) To defeat these groups, the US and its allies need to adopt a strategy that is rooted in an acknowledg­ment of the nature of our true enemy: radical Islam. (…) Caroline B. Glick, JPO, 16.11.15 France's miserable intelligence failure (…) the French got a wakeup call in January, but kept sleeping.(…) In spite of whatever steps were taken, the attacks were not prevented.(…) After January, the French took a number of minor steps, but avoided a comprehensive reform. The French should have trained additional, massive manpower to deal with situations of terror; to train legal person­nel to file charges against terror elements and per­form constitutional changes; to purchase a lot of equipment, mainly intelligence machines, which would allow an advanced infiltration of social media, and to get assistance from other countries that have dealt with such situations in the past. That didn't happen as well.(…) Israel offered different types of aid(…), and received a polite refusal. A key failure is the hesitation to join international systems coordinat­ing the war on terror.(…) Cooperation could have generated, for example, a list of suspects who would 1